Nishad Khan Pl and Nishad Khan v. Regions Bank, Neka LLC, Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary and Unknown

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 2025
Docket6D2024-0708
StatusPublished

This text of Nishad Khan Pl and Nishad Khan v. Regions Bank, Neka LLC, Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary and Unknown (Nishad Khan Pl and Nishad Khan v. Regions Bank, Neka LLC, Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary and Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nishad Khan Pl and Nishad Khan v. Regions Bank, Neka LLC, Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary and Unknown, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case Nos. 6D2023-3551, 6D2024-0708 CONSOLIDATED Lower Tribunal Nos. 2020-CA-001869-O and 2021-CA-000401 _____________________________

NISHAD KHAN PL and NISHAD KHAN,

Appellants,

v.

REGIONS BANK, NEKA, LLC, and AHMED HUSSEIN EL-HAWARY,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Vincent S. Chiu, Judge.

November 14, 2025

MIZE, J.

Appellants, Nishad Khan PL and Nishad Khan (“Khan”), appeal the trial

court’s Amended Final Judgment entered in favor of Appellees NEKA, LLC

(“NEKA”) and Ahmed El-Hawary (“El-Hawary”), and the trial court’s Final

Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in Favor of El-Hawary. The parties had a

complicated business relationship and, subsequently, a complicated business dispute that culminated in a bench trial in the proceedings below. The details of

that dispute are not necessary to explain our disposition of this appeal.

We find no error in the Amended Final Judgment and, therefore, affirm it.

As to the Final Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, the trial court entered an

award of attorneys’ fees in favor of El-Hawary and against Khan pursuant to a

provision in the operating agreement for NEKA, which stated that:

Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each Member shall indemnify the Company, each other Member and hold them harmless from and against all losses, costs, liabilities, damages, and expenses (including, without limitation, costs of suit and attorney’s fees) they may incur on account of any breach by that Member of this Agreement.

However, the proceedings below did not involve any claim for breach of the

operating agreement, nor did the trial court make any finding that any such breach

occurred. For these reasons, the trial court erred by granting an award of

attorneys’ fees under this provision. The Final Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees and

Costs in Favor of El-Hawary is reversed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Nicholas A. Shannin and Carol B. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

John M. Brennan, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Orlando, and Kristie L. Hatcher-Bolin, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees, Neka, LLC and Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary.

2 No Appearance for Appellee, Regions Bank.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nishad Khan Pl and Nishad Khan v. Regions Bank, Neka LLC, Ahmed Hussein El-Hawary and Unknown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nishad-khan-pl-and-nishad-khan-v-regions-bank-neka-llc-ahmed-hussein-fladistctapp-2025.