NISCHWITZ v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

NISCHWITZ v. State

229 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2007 WL 2034252

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 17, 2007

DocketED 87947

StatusPublished

This text of 229 S.W.3d 626 (NISCHWITZ v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NISCHWITZ v. State, 229 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2007 WL 2034252 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jacques Nischwitz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jacques Nischwitz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2007 WL 2034252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nischwitz-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack