Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.
88 A. 6, 240 Pa. 571, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 717
Opinion
This demurrer ought to have been overruled. No reason was given by the court below for sustaining it, and the judgment on it in favor of the defendant is reversed, with leave to plead.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co., 88 A. 6, 240 Pa. 571, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 717 (Pa. 1913).
88 A. 6 (Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Weglein
21 Pa. D. & C. 509 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
In Re Kardos
27 F.2d 690 (Second Circuit, 1928)
Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.
91 A. 883 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)