Ningxia Communications Construction Co Ltd v. American Kono Group
This text of Ningxia Communications Construction Co Ltd v. American Kono Group (Ningxia Communications Construction Co Ltd v. American Kono Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 NINGXIA COMMUNICATIONS CASE NO. C21-0917-JCC CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., 10 ORDER 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 AMERICAN KONO GROUP, ABRAHAM 13 HENGYUCIUS a/k/a HENGYU ZHANG, and DOES 1–10, 14 15 Defendants. 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s renewed motion for default judgment 17 (Dkt. No. 23). Defendants were properly served with process on August 6, 2021, but have not 18 appeared, and the Clerk has entered an order of default. (Dkt. Nos. 12, 13, 17.) Plaintiff moves 19 for default judgment. (Dkt. No. 23.) Having thoroughly considered the motion and relevant 20 record, and finding a hearing unnecessary, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. 21 The Court has discretion to enter a default judgment. See Lau Ah Yew v. Dulles, 236 F.2d 22 415, 416 (9th Cir. 1956). “The general rule of law is that upon default[,] the factual allegations of 23 the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, will be taken as true.” Geddes v. 24 United Fin. Group, 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977) (citing Pope v. United States, 323 U.S. 1, 25 12 (1944)); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6). In determining the amount of damages, the Court may—but 26 1 is not required to—hold a hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)(B). To recover damages after 2 securing an entry of default, the plaintiff must prove the relief it seeks through testimony or 3 written affidavit. Bd. of Trs. of the Boilermaker Vacation Trust v. Skelly, Inc., 389 F. Supp. 2d 4 1222, 1226 (N.D. Cal. 2005). 5 Plaintiff requests $17,750 in attorney fees, $700 in costs, and $85,762.38 in damages. (Dkt. 6 No. 23 at 7.). The default rule that a prevailing litigant is not entitled to collect attorney fees may 7 be overcome where an enforceable contract allocates such fees. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Pac. 8 Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S. 443, 448 (2007). Here, Section 7(b) of the parties’ contract contains 9 such an allocation, providing that “[a]ll fees related to the lawsuit on this deal shall be borne by the 10 losing party.” (Dkt. No. 23-1 at 3.) The Court finds that the requested awards are reasonable and 11 sufficiently supported by written affidavits establishing entitlement to the amounts sought. 12 LCR 55(b)(2)(A). (See also Dkt Nos. 23 at 8, 11; 23-1 at 2; 23-2 at 2.) 13 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 14 1. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED. 15 2. Default judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants. 16 3. Plaintiff is AWARDED attorney fees of $17,750, costs of $700, and damages in the 17 amount of $85,762.38. 18 4. Post-judgment interest on the judgment shall accrue at the statutory rate set forth in 19 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 20 21 DATED this 4th day of April 2022. A 22 23 24 John C. Coughenour 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ningxia Communications Construction Co Ltd v. American Kono Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ningxia-communications-construction-co-ltd-v-american-kono-group-wawd-2022.