Ninfa Soliz v. the State of Texas
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-21-00254-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
NINFA SOLIZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 156th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on its own motion. The trial court’s certification of
the defendant’s right to appeal indicates appellant does not have the right to appeal this
matter. Accordingly, on August 16, 2021, the Court ordered appellant’s counsel to review
the record, determine whether appellant has a right to appeal, and forward their findings
to the court within thirty days. Appellant’s counsel did not comply with the order. This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further
delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3 and 44.4. Accordingly,
this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the
trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and
recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether the trial court certificate of
defendant’s right to appeal is accurate; (2) whether appellant’s rights are adversely
affected by a continued delay; (3) whether appellant wishes to pursue his
appeal; and (4) if any other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit
of appellant’s appeal.
Upon remand, the trial court shall also determine whether appellant is entitled to
court-appointed counsel. If the trial court determines new counsel should be appointed,
the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. If the trial court
determines appellant has abandoned this appeal and/or is not entitled to court-
appointment counsel, it shall issue such findings.
The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of
any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from
the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
2 Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 27th day of September, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ninfa Soliz v. the State of Texas (Ninfa Soliz v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.