Nine Penn Center Associates v. Board of Revision of Taxes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Nine Penn Center Associates v. Board of Revision of Taxes

729 A.2d 1119, 556 Pa. 579, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1607

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 8, 1999·No. Petition No. 0693 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 1999, the above-captioned Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

I. Did the Commonwealth Court err by allowing Respondents to challenge the validity of the same abatements that they asked for, received, accepted and enjoyed?

II. Did the Commonwealth Court err by precluding the taxing authorities from equitably recouping the benefits that Respondents received under their initial five-year abatements?

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the decision or consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 1999, the above-captioned Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

I. Did the Commonwealth Court err by allowing Respondents to challenge the validity of the same abatements that they asked for, received, accepted and enjoyed?

II. Did the Commonwealth Court err by precluding the taxing authorities from equitably recouping the benefits that Respondents received under their initial five-year abatements?

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the decision or consideration of this matter.

Nine Penn Center Associates v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 729 A.2d 1119, 556 Pa. 579, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1607 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

729 A.2d 1119 (Nine Penn Center Associates v. Board of Revision of Taxes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related