NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge
This text of NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge (NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NINA HICKS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D16-1565
EMERITUS AT OAKBRIDGE, ET AL,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed June 13, 2016.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mark A. Massey, Judge.
Date of Accident: January 30, 2013.
Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.
Thomas P. Vecchio of Vecchio, Carrier, Feldman & Johannessen, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
This court having received Appellees’ confession of error and request to
remand based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s recent opinion in Castellanos v.
Next Door Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S197 (Fla. April 28, 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion, the order of the Judge of Compensation
Claims is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent
with that opinion.
ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nina-hicks-v-emeritus-at-oakbridge-fladistctapp-2016.