NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2016·No. 16-1565·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NINA HICKS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-1565

EMERITUS AT OAKBRIDGE, ET AL,

Appellee.

_____________________________/ Opinion filed June 13, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mark A. Massey, Judge.

Date of Accident: January 30, 2013. Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.

Thomas P. Vecchio of Vecchio, Carrier, Feldman & Johannessen, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This court having received Appellees’ confession of error and request to remand based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s recent opinion in Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S197 (Fla. April 28, 2016), and finding that

reversal is warranted in light of that opinion, the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge (NINA HICKS v. Emeritus at Oakbridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.