Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy

197 Ill. App. 376

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 3, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,387

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 Ill. App. 376 (Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy, 197 Ill. App. 376 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Estoppel, § 63*—when presentation of hill for amount less than contract price not. estoppel to recover contract price. An architect who agrees to draw plans and specifications for a building for a certain price may not be denied a lien for the contract price, upon performance of the contract, because he presented a bill for a lesser amount, where such bill was intended as a compromise and was not accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Estoppel, § 63*—when presentation of hill for amount less than contract price not. estoppel to recover contract price. An architect who agrees to draw plans and specifications for a building for a certain price may not be denied a lien for the contract price, upon performance of the contract, because he presented a bill for a lesser amount, where such bill was intended as a compromise and was not accepted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. App. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nimmons-v-lyon-healy-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack