Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy

197 Ill. App. 376

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 3, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,387·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Estoppel, § 63*—when presentation of hill for amount less than contract price not. estoppel to recover contract price. An architect who agrees to draw plans and specifications for a building for a certain price may not be denied a lien for the contract price, upon performance of the contract, because he presented a bill for a lesser amount, where such bill was intended as a compromise and was not accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Estoppel, § 63*—when presentation of hill for amount less than contract price not. estoppel to recover contract price. An architect who agrees to draw plans and specifications for a building for a certain price may not be denied a lien for the contract price, upon performance of the contract, because he presented a bill for a lesser amount, where such bill was intended as a compromise and was not accepted.

Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy, 197 Ill. App. 376 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

197 Ill. App. 376 (Nimmons v. Lyon & Healy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related