Nimmon v. Worthington

Indiana Supreme Court

Nimmon v. Worthington

1 Smith & H. 226

DecidedMay 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Smith & H. 226 (Nimmon v. Worthington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nimmon v. Worthington, 1 Smith & H. 226 (Ind. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

Blackford, J.

— “That proof would, no doubt, have been necessary, if the endorsement had been properly denied under oath. But there was no such denial, nor was the endorsement even objected to when offered in evidence. The consequence is, that it must now be considered that the endorsement, as well as the note, ivas legally before the Court. The motion for a new trial was therefore correctly overruled.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackford, J.

— “That proof would, no doubt, have been necessary, if the endorsement had been properly denied under oath. But there was no such denial, nor was the endorsement even objected to when offered in evidence. The consequence is, that it must now be considered that the endorsement, as well as the note, ivas legally before the Court. The motion for a new trial was therefore correctly overruled.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Smith & H. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nimmon-v-worthington-ind-1849.