Nilio v. State

176 So. 3d 1286, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16217, 2015 WL 6614004
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nilio v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9647
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2015·No. No. 1D15-0776·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Joseph Nilio appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, by order entered March 4, 2015.1 In light of Appellant’s numerous pro se filings in this court, and noting this court’s opinion and remand in Nilio v. State, 165 So.3d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) for post-conviction proceedings, on September 29, 2015, this court issued an order for Appellant to show cause why the order on appeal here should not be summarily affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315, 9.410.

Appellant timely responded to this court’s order to show cause, but his response does not show a preliminary basis for reversing the circuit court’s order. It is well settled that the writ of habeas corpus is not available as a second appeal or substitute for post-conviction proceedings under the applicable rules of criminal procedure. Accordingly, the circuit court’s order entered March 4, 2015 is summarily affirmed pursuant to rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant’s response denies any bad faith filing and shows merely a basic misunderstanding of the rules governing the procedures of this court. In spite of Appellant’s twenty-one previous appeals in this court, and the twelve appeals filed subsequent to this appeal, all pertaining to the judgments and sentences entered in 2010 by the Fourth Judicial Circuit in Nassau County, Florida; and considering Appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause; the court declines to sanction [1287]*1287Appellant by limiting his filings in this court to those signed by a member of the Florida Bar at this time. See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So.2d 20 (Fla.2008); Hall v. State, 94 So.3d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Appellant is cautioned that abuse of this court’s processes in the future may subject him to such limitations.

BENTON, OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nilio v. State, 176 So. 3d 1286, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16217, 2015 WL 6614004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

176 So. 3d 1286 (Nilio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pettway v. McNeil
987 So. 2d 20 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Michael Joseph Nilio v. State of Florida
165 So. 3d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Hall v. State
94 So. 3d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)