Niles v. McConaughey
This text of 1 Del. Cas. 505 (Niles v. McConaughey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was in this case determined that the charge of a cash item on a book of original entries regularly and fairly kept cannot be recovered where the only evidence to support the action is the book supported by the oath of the party; nor admitted as a set off under the Act about defalcation, [1 Del.Laws 162,] because the payment of money is not a matter properly chargeable in an account, within the meaning of the Act concerning contracts and assumptions, 1 Del.Laws 328.
[Note.] So it was said by the Court in Smith and Brown v. McBeath, Administrator of Lowber, November Term, 1814, “Cash items are not properly chargeable in account.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Del. Cas. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niles-v-mcconaughey-del-1805.