Nikonowicz v. Difani

381 S.W.3d 402, 2012 WL 4883248, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1302
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97721·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Joseph Difani appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying joint legal custody of his minor children to primary legal custody in favor of Rita Elizabeth Nikonowicz. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Margolis v. Steinberg, 242 S.W.3d 394, 397 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nikonowicz v. Difani, 381 S.W.3d 402, 2012 WL 4883248, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 402 (Nikonowicz v. Difani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Margolis v. Steinberg
242 S.W.3d 394 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)