Nikola v. Mic General Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Nikola v. Mic General Insurance Co.

499 Mich. 935

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 25, 2016

DocketNo. 152535

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 499 Mich. 935 (Nikola v. Mic General Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nikola v. Mic General Insurance Co., 499 Mich. 935 (Mich. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether an insured making a claim for underinsured motorist benefits may be considered to be a “third party tort claimant” under MCL 500.2006(4), thereby requiring the insurer to pay twelve percent interest for failing to pay the claim on a timely basis only if the claim “is not reasonably in dispute”; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals decision in this case is consistent with Yaldo v North Pointe Ins Co, 457 Mich 341 (1998), and Griswold Props, LLC v Lexington Ins Co, 276 Mich App 551 (2007). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether an insured making a claim for underinsured motorist benefits may be considered to be a “third party tort claimant” under MCL 500.2006(4), thereby requiring the insurer to pay twelve percent interest for failing to pay the claim on a timely basis only if the claim “is not reasonably in dispute”; and (2) whether the Court of Appeals decision in this case is consistent with Yaldo v North Pointe Ins Co, 457 Mich 341 (1998), and Griswold Props, LLC v Lexington Ins Co, 276 Mich App 551 (2007). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 Mich. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nikola-v-mic-general-insurance-co-mich-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack