Nikola v. May Dept. Stores Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nikola v. May Dept. Stores Co.

882 S.W.2d 763, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1994 WL 463889

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 1994·No. No. 64865·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ cause of action. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by substantial evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ cause of action. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by substantial evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Nikola v. May Dept. Stores Co., 882 S.W.2d 763, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1994 WL 463889 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 763 (Nikola v. May Dept. Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.