Nikkari v. Faubel

273 A.D. 901, 78 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1948·No. No. 196·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to substitute in pending appeal the executrix of plaintiff, granted. (Ho. 197.) Motion to compel respondents to furnish missing exhibits or for other relief denied, without costs. Upon the settlement of the case on appeal before the Justice who tried the case (Mr. Justice Davis), counsel for the parties are directed to appear together with the witness who, upon the trial, drew the exhibit in question, and there agree upon a reproduction of the exhibit in the record on appeal. In the event of disagreement between counsel, the Trial Justice will settle the issue and decide upon the form and content of the reproduced exhibit in the same manner as he would settle any other dispute relating to the contents of the record. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nikkari v. Faubel, 273 A.D. 901, 78 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 901 (Nikkari v. Faubel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Liberty Fast Freight. Co.
279 A.D. 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)