Nikkari v. Faubel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nikkari v. Faubel

273 A.D. 901, 78 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1948

DocketNo. 196

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 901 (Nikkari v. Faubel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nikkari v. Faubel, 273 A.D. 901, 78 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to substitute in pending appeal the executrix of plaintiff, granted. (Ho. 197.) Motion to compel respondents to furnish missing exhibits or for other relief denied, without costs. Upon the settlement of the case on appeal before the Justice who tried the case (Mr. Justice Davis), counsel for the parties are directed to appear together with the witness who, upon the trial, drew the exhibit in question, and there agree upon a reproduction of the exhibit in the record on appeal. In the event of disagreement between counsel, the Trial Justice will settle the issue and decide upon the form and content of the reproduced exhibit in the same manner as he would settle any other dispute relating to the contents of the record. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to substitute in pending appeal the executrix of plaintiff, granted. (Ho. 197.) Motion to compel respondents to furnish missing exhibits or for other relief denied, without costs. Upon the settlement of the case on appeal before the Justice who tried the case (Mr. Justice Davis), counsel for the parties are directed to appear together with the witness who, upon the trial, drew the exhibit in question, and there agree upon a reproduction of the exhibit in the record on appeal. In the event of disagreement between counsel, the Trial Justice will settle the issue and decide upon the form and content of the reproduced exhibit in the same manner as he would settle any other dispute relating to the contents of the record. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 901, 78 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nikkari-v-faubel-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack