NIKIEL, GARY A. v. ORZECH, PATRICIA

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

58 CAF 11-01213 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF GARY A. NIKIEL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICIA ORZECH, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

KUSTELL LAW GROUP, LLP, BUFFALO (CARL B. KUSTELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

MCCREADY & TODARO, BUFFALO (MAUREEN A. MCCREADY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

FRANCINE E. MODICA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, TONAWANDA, FOR HANNAH G.N.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, A.J.), entered July 14, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of Patricia Orzech to reopen trial testimony.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Orzech v Nikiel (___ AD3d ___ [Jan. 31, 2012]).

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court