Nike, Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.

Opinion

Case: 24-2074 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2026

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

NIKE, INC., Appellant

v.

LULULEMON ATHLETICA CANADA INC., LULULEMON USA INC.,

Appellees

______________________

2024-2074

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 00180.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

AARON PATRICK BOWLING, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JOSEPH HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER J. RENK; MICHAEL J. SEBBA, Los Angeles, CA.

BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SETH W. LLOYD; MEHRAN ARJOMAND, ALEX S. YAP, Los Angeles, CA; KYLE W.K. MOONEY, New York, NY.

Case: 24-2074 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2026

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 13, 2026 Date