Nigri v. Franz
227 A.D. 765
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Notwithstanding the fact that the damages which have been recovered may be excessive, they were recovered wdth the acquiescence of the party who is now seeking to set them aside. No other valid reason is assigned for granting this motion. The orders appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nigri v. Franz, 227 A.D. 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 765 (Nigri v. Franz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Uptown Transportation Corp. v. Fisk Discount Corp.
151 Misc. 469 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Franz v. Nigri
232 A.D. 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)