Nightingale v. Scannell

6 Cal. 506
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 506 (Nightingale v. Scannell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nightingale v. Scannell, 6 Cal. 506 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Where one partner sues for an injury to the partnership property, and makes his co-partner a defendant for the want of his consent to join as plaintiff, the recovery must be entire for the whole injury.

The law will not tolerate the division of a joint right of action into several actions; the whole cause of action must be determined in one, and thus avoid a multiplicity of suits. ' ®

In such case, the partner recovering is liable to account to his co-partner defendant, and the latter is interested immediately in the event of the suit, and is not therefore a competent witness for the plaintiff.

Whether such a non-joinder of the plaintiffs is within the spirit and meaning of the statute so as to be permitted, we do not mean here to decide, as the question is not raised.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Blade
123 F. Supp. 131 (S.D. California, 1954)
Martin v. Howe
211 P. 453 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
Lewis v. Hayes
171 P. 293 (California Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nightingale-v-scannell-cal-1856.