Nifas, R. v. Wetzel, J.
This text of Nifas, R. v. Wetzel, J. (Nifas, R. v. Wetzel, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RASHEED NIFAS, : No. 43 WAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE : SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, JEFFREY : WITHERITE, GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL : GEHLMANN, JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, : ALLEN JOSEPH, MELISSA HAINSWORTH : AND JOSEPH BIANCONI, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nifas, R. v. Wetzel, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nifas-r-v-wetzel-j-pa-2022.