Nieves v. Venettozzi

102 A.D.3d 1027, 957 N.Y.S.2d 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 17, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 102 A.D.3d 1027 (Nieves v. Venettozzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nieves v. Venettozzi, 102 A.D.3d 1027, 957 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review a determination finding him guilty of having violated certain prison disciplinary rules. The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it provide substantial evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of being out of place (see Matter of Povoski v Fischer, 93 AD3d 963, 964 [2012], appeal dismissed 19 NY3d 1020 [2012]; Matter of Jackson v Smith, 49 AD3d 933, 933 [2008]). Petitioner’s assertion that he had permission to be in the area where he was found created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Povoski v Fischer, 93 AD3d at 964). Respondent concedes, however, and we agree, that the determination finding petitioner guilty of making false statements must be annulled. Inasmuch as petitioner has already served the penalty imposed and no loss of good time was involved, remittal to redetermine the penalty is unnecessary (see Matter of Franza v Venettozzi, 98 AD3d 782, 782-783 [2012]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, to the extent they are properly before us, are without merit.

Peters, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of making false statements; petition granted to that extent and the Com[1028]*1028missioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lewis v. Annucci
2017 NY Slip Op 8582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
McClough v. Fischer
118 A.D.3d 1228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Elias v. Fischer
118 A.D.3d 1193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Macedonio v. Fischer
116 A.D.3d 1313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Rivera v. Fischer
110 A.D.3d 1277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sylvester v. Fischer
108 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Jiminez v. Prack
107 A.D.3d 1266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Bermudez v. Fischer
107 A.D.3d 1269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.3d 1027, 957 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-venettozzi-nyappdiv-2013.