Nieves v. Union Hospital of the Bronx

234 A.D.2d 143, 651 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12538
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeals from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered September 14, 1995, which, sua sponte, deemed the action dismissed as against defendant-respondent City unless either plaintiff-appellant or defendant-appellant advised the court in writing by a date certain of a theory of liability against defendant-respondent, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Inasmuch as the order was conditional, appellants were not “ 'aggrieved’ ” and their appeals are at best premature (Matter [144]*144of Leo T., 87 AD2d 297, 298). Furthermore, since plaintiff has submitted the necessary response to the court, the proposed dismissal would now appear moot. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nieves v. Union Hospital of the Bronx, 234 A.D.2d 143, 651 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 143 (Nieves v. Union Hospital of the Bronx) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soggs v. Crocco
247 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)