Nieves v. Nieves

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nieves v. Nieves

98 So. 3d 749, 2012 WL 4795696, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17454

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 10, 2012

DocketNo. 4D12-1201

StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 3d 749 (Nieves v. Nieves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nieves v. Nieves, 98 So. 3d 749, 2012 WL 4795696, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the wife’s appeals of the trial court’s order on the husband’s motion for court to determine date of valuation and the trial court’s order on the wife’s motion to vacate trial date, as we lack jurisdiction to review these non-final, non-appealable orders. Dismissal is without prejudice to the wife raising her arguments on plenary-appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. The trial court’s order on the wife’s urgent motion for stop-gap interim award for wife and counsel is affirmed. Lastly, we deny the wife’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part, petition denied.

MAY, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the wife’s appeals of the trial court’s order on the husband’s motion for court to determine date of valuation and the trial court’s order on the wife’s motion to vacate trial date, as we lack jurisdiction to review these non-final, non-appealable orders. Dismissal is without prejudice to the wife raising her arguments on plenary-appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. The trial court’s order on the wife’s urgent motion for stop-gap interim award for wife and counsel is affirmed. Lastly, we deny the wife’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part, petition denied.

MAY, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 So. 3d 749, 2012 WL 4795696, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-nieves-fladistctapp-2012.