Home/New York Court of Appeals/Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

438 N.E.2d 1145, 56 N.Y.2d 914, 453 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3508
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 438 N.E.2d 1145 (Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc., 438 N.E.2d 1145, 56 N.Y.2d 914, 453 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3508 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

[916]*916OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree that plaintiff was not a third-party beneficiary of the agreement between C.G.M. Check Cashing Corporation and Holmes Protection, Inc., for provision of a burglar alarm system. Nor can it be said as a matter of law that negligence, if any, on defendant’s part was the proximate cause of the injuries suffered.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Robert Bruce McLane Assocs., Inc.
201 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
World Trade Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Lido Knitting Mills, Inc.
154 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.
521 N.E.2d 780 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 N.E.2d 1145, 56 N.Y.2d 914, 453 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-holmes-protection-inc-ny-1982.