Nieves v. Goord

2 A.D.3d 1173, 768 N.Y.S.2d 711, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13936
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 2003·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

[1174] Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit the unauthorized possession of money and possession of drugs. The charges stem from the discovery of $160, cocaine and heroin hidden inside a pilaster* which was accessible from inside petitioner’s cell. Notwithstanding the fact that other inmates had access to the area where the contraband was found, the fact that the contraband was found in an area within petitioner’s control gives rise to a reasonable inference of possession (see Matter of Johnson v Racette, 282 AD2d 899 [2001]; Matter of Fernandez v Stinson, 251 AD2d 887 [1998]). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and supporting documentation, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fugate v Goord, 277 AD2d 626 [2000]). Furthermore, our review of the record fails to support » petitioner’s claim of hearing officer bias or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Thomas v Selsky, 256 AD2d 712 [1998]). Petitioner’s remaining contention, that he was denied the right to observe the search of his cell, has been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nieves v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 1173, 768 N.Y.S.2d 711, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 1173 (Nieves v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Fischer
95 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Vento v. Goord
41 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Johnson v. Goord
487 F. Supp. 2d 377 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Costner v. Goord
31 A.D.3d 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Dixon v. Miller
28 A.D.3d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Daum v. Goord
27 A.D.3d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Brown v. Goord
17 A.D.3d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Sanchez v. Selsky
8 A.D.3d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Lorenzo v. Neuwrith
8 A.D.3d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Nimmons v. Goord
7 A.D.3d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Goberdhan v. Goord
7 A.D.3d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)