Nieves v. Gonzales
This text of 158 F. App'x 860 (Nieves v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ruben Quintero Nieves and Francisca Perez Rodriguez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of [861]*861removal. We lack jurisdiction to review whether the petitioners have demonstrated the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to qualifying relatives for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) (2) (B) (i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F. App'x 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.