Nieves v. Diaz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nieves v. Diaz

616 So. 2d 1223, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4719, 1993 WL 130573

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2264

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 1223 (Nieves v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nieves v. Diaz, 616 So. 2d 1223, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4719, 1993 WL 130573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As appellees have disclaimed the intention to seek a deficiency judgment, there is no reason to correct the two conceded errors in the final judgment of foreclosure. We perceive no basis on which to conclude that the two errors had the effect of chilling the bidding at the foreclosure sale. For that reason and for the additional reason that appellants have unclean hands by virtue of a bad faith bankruptcy filing, we do not disturb the sale.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As appellees have disclaimed the intention to seek a deficiency judgment, there is no reason to correct the two conceded errors in the final judgment of foreclosure. We perceive no basis on which to conclude that the two errors had the effect of chilling the bidding at the foreclosure sale. For that reason and for the additional reason that appellants have unclean hands by virtue of a bad faith bankruptcy filing, we do not disturb the sale.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 1223, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4719, 1993 WL 130573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-diaz-fladistctapp-1993.