Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Nieto v. Previte

Nieto v. Previte

54 A.D.2d 514, 386 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13769
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 26, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 514 (Nieto v. Previte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nieto v. Previte, 54 A.D.2d 514, 386 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on August 25, 1976, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that there are insufficient findings in the referee’s report of irregularities, improprieties and fraudulent practices. (See Matter of Mercorella v Benza, 37 NY2d 792; 49 AD2d 716.) We have no transcript of the evidence and therefore cannot say that the referee’s findings are not supported by the evidence. Concur&emdash;Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mercorella v. Benza
337 N.E.2d 611 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Mercorella v. Benza
49 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 514, 386 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieto-v-previte-nyappdiv-1976.