Nieto v. Allied Interstate, LLC

599 F. App'x 74
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 2, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2224
StatusPublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 74 (Nieto v. Allied Interstate, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nieto v. Allied Interstate, LLC, 599 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

[75]*75Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Felix Nieto appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment in Nieto’s civil action, which was brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. See 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nieto v. Allied Interstate, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-08495-CCB, 2014 WL 4980376 (D.Md. Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieto-v-allied-interstate-llc-ca4-2015.