Nienstedt v. Dorrington

141 P. 569, 16 Ariz. 121, 1914 Ariz. LEXIS 107
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided June 12, 1914·No. Civil No. 1393·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

FRANKLIN, G. J.

The appellee had judgment against the appellant for the restitution of certain lands and premises. The certificate of the clerk of the court below shows that judgment was rendered January 28, 1913, on which day, appellant’s motion for a new trial being denied, he gave notice of appeal to this court; that on January 30, 1913, the bond on appeal was filed; that on April 28, 1913, the appellant filed With the clerk of the lower court the transcript of the reporter’s notes in said cause; that no further steps have been taken by appellant to prosecute his appeal to this court.

It is ordered that said appeal be docketed in this court, and that the same be and it is hereby dismissed, the appellee to recover his costs.

It is further ordered and adjudged that the appellee be and he is hereby awarded damages in the sum of $50; the said amount being deemed proper in this case as damages for a manifestly frivolous appéal.

ROSS, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nienstedt v. Dorrington, 141 P. 569, 16 Ariz. 121, 1914 Ariz. LEXIS 107 (Ark. 1914).

141 P. 569 (Nienstedt v. Dorrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Cowan
187 P. 267 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)
Head Hotel Co. v. Wilson
173 P. 417 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1918)
Mounce v. Garrett
169 P. 458 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1917)
Williams v. West Publishing Co.
164 P. 317 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1917)
Baca v. Noyes-Norman Shoe Co.
161 P. 884 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1916)
Willis v. Ivy
141 P. 570 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1914)