Niemann v. Collyer
This text of 24 N.Y.S. 516 (Niemann v. Collyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not find any valid exceptions. Only a question of fact is involved, viz. the value of plaintiff’s services. The referee has large experience, and his findings are sustained by the evidence. The plaintiff was called into important unfinished litigations, to succeed very distinguished counsel, who had failed to satisfy the client, tinder such circumstances, it cannot be successfully contended that the matters were trivial, and not worthy of compensation. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 N.Y.S. 516, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niemann-v-collyer-nysupct-1893.