Niemann v. Chamblin Props., LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Niemann v. Chamblin Props., LLC

577 S.W.3d 522

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2019·No. WD 81617·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chamblin Properties appeals the judgment of the Chariton County Circuit Court finding that Chamblin had to honor an agreement allowing the Respondents in this case to use a road over Chamblin's land. Chamblin complains in three points on appeal that the trial court erred in finding an easement of necessity, in finding a meeting of the minds between the parties, and ignoring the statute of frauds and binding non-parties to a contract. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Chamblin Properties appeals the judgment of the Chariton County Circuit Court finding that Chamblin had to honor an agreement allowing the Respondents in this case to use a road over Chamblin's land. Chamblin complains in three points on appeal that the trial court erred in finding an easement of necessity, in finding a meeting of the minds between the parties, and ignoring the statute of frauds and binding non-parties to a contract. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Niemann v. Chamblin Props., LLC, 577 S.W.3d 522 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

577 S.W.3d 522 (Niemann v. Chamblin Props., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.