Nielson v. Turner
501 P.2d 1206, 28 Utah 2d 302, 1972 Utah LEXIS 855
Opinion
Appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Affirmed.
Appellant’s brief says these proceedings were undertaken in order “to clarify and perfect his position in terms of exhaustion of state remedies before proceeding to federal court,” — whatever that means. Appellant and counsel may proceed anywhere for any legitimate purpose if it is within the bounds of professional conduct, and free from jurisdictional problems.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nielson v. Turner, 501 P.2d 1206, 28 Utah 2d 302, 1972 Utah LEXIS 855 (Utah 1972).
501 P.2d 1206 (Nielson v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.