Nielson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nielson v. State

220 So. 3d 463, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1262, 2017 WL 456905

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2017·No. Case No. 5D17-253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Andrew Wyatt Nielson, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus claiming he is being unlawfully detained in that the trial court did not conduct a full bond hearing to determine reasonable conditions for pre-trial release pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b). We agree and grant the petition for habeas corpus. We remand the matter back to trial court to conduct a full bond hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b).

PETITION GRANTED, REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

BERGER, WALLIS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Andrew Wyatt Nielson, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus claiming he is being unlawfully detained in that the trial court did not conduct a full bond hearing to determine reasonable conditions for pre-trial release pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b). We agree and grant the petition for habeas corpus. We remand the matter back to trial court to conduct a full bond hearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b).

PETITION GRANTED, REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

BERGER, WALLIS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Nielson v. State, 220 So. 3d 463, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1262, 2017 WL 456905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

220 So. 3d 463 (Nielson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.