Nielson v. State

681 So. 2d 724, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4755, 1996 WL 239289
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1996·No. No. 95-00721·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kalen J. Nielson appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated battery. We affirm his conviction without discussion. As to his sentence, however, we agree that the trial court erred in imposing a cost of prosecution and certain probation conditions. We strike condition (9), ordering payment to First Step, because no statutory authority was provided. See Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We strike the portion of condition (10), ordering Nielson to pay for random testing, because it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Luby. Last, we strike $80 assessed for costs of prosecution because the trial court failed to follow the statutory procedures. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc).

Affirmed; cost of prosecution and certain probation conditions struck.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nielson v. State, 681 So. 2d 724, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4755, 1996 WL 239289 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 724 (Nielson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Luby v. State
648 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)