Nielsen v. Wakefield

Michigan Supreme Court

Nielsen v. Wakefield

43 Mich. 434

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 Mich. 434 (Nielsen v. Wakefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nielsen v. Wakefield, 43 Mich. 434 (Mich. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

M'arston, C. J.

Proceedings were taken to lay out a highway.- The commissioner returns that a meeting was held to view the premises, ascertain and determine the necessity of laying out the highway and to appraise the damages, and that although action was taken at that meeting, yet there was no proof of service of notice thereof in any manner. The ease is therefore disposed of by previous decisions and the proceedings must be quashed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'arston, C. J.

Proceedings were taken to lay out a highway.- The commissioner returns that a meeting was held to view the premises, ascertain and determine the necessity of laying out the highway and to appraise the damages, and that although action was taken at that meeting, yet there was no proof of service of notice thereof in any manner. The ease is therefore disposed of by previous decisions and the proceedings must be quashed.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Mich. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nielsen-v-wakefield-mich-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack