Nielsen v. Wakefield
43 Mich. 434
Opinion
Proceedings were taken to lay out a highway.- The commissioner returns that a meeting was held to view the premises, ascertain and determine the necessity of laying out the highway and to appraise the damages, and that although action was taken at that meeting, yet there was no proof of service of notice thereof in any manner. The ease is therefore disposed of by previous decisions and the proceedings must be quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nielsen v. Wakefield, 43 Mich. 434 (Mich. 1880).
43 Mich. 434 (Nielsen v. Wakefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
La Barre v. Bent
118 N.W. 6 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.
19 S.W. 518 (Texas Supreme Court, 1892)