Nielsen v. Joannou
This text of 861 So. 2d 1283 (Nielsen v. Joannou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bjarne F. NIELSEN, Appellant,
v.
Pavlo JOANNOU, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Geoffrey B. Dobson, St. Augustine, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
*1284 PLEUS, J.
This case involves specific performance of a contract to convey real property. Nielsen appeals a final summary judgment granting specific performance to the buyer, Joannou. He argues that the lower court erred in entering a final judgment while an interlocutory appeal in the same case was pending in this court. He also argues that the court erred in failing to add an indispensable party to the action. Joannou confessed error and did not file an answer brief.
Because we conclude that the lower court erred in entering a summary final judgment which violates Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(f), we reverse and remand. The court below further erred in entering the final judgment without first joining an indispensable party. See Nielsen v. Joannou, 835 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 1283, 2004 WL 19504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nielsen-v-joannou-fladistctapp-2004.