Nielsen v. Carmichael
This text of 99 F.2d 1010 (Nielsen v. Carmichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the Clerk of the District Court as provided by Rule 18; and it further appearing that appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day and that no extension of time has been obtained therefor. On consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be and the same is docketed and dismissed, the costs to be charged against the government as constructive earnings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 F.2d 1010, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nielsen-v-carmichael-ca6-1938.