Niego v. Braun

212 A.D.2d 445, 623 N.Y.S.2d 109
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered on or about May 13, 1994, granting summary judgment to plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim for prima facie tort, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As alleged in the complaint and conceded by defendant in his answer and counterclaims, a contractual relationship was established between the parties and there exists a dispute over monies transferred from plaintiff to defendant in connection with that relationship. Thus, the motion court properly found that defendant’s prima facie tort counterclaim cannot stand because both the complaint and answering papers establish that plaintiff’s sole motive in bringing this action was not " 'disinterested malevolence’ ” (Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Lindner, 59 NY2d 314, 333). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Niego v. Braun, 212 A.D.2d 445, 623 N.Y.S.2d 109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 445 (Niego v. Braun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fada Industries, Inc. v. Falchi Building Co.
189 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
International Shared Services, Inc. v. County of Nassau
222 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)