Niedbalski v. Niedbalski

Missouri Court of Appeals

Niedbalski v. Niedbalski

540 S.W.3d 409

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105163

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 409 (Niedbalski v. Niedbalski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Niedbalski v. Niedbalski, 540 S.W.3d 409 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Niedbalski appeals the judgment granting in part and denying in part his motion to quash garnishments filed by Karen Niedbalski, n/k/a Lukas. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*410The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Niedbalski appeals the judgment granting in part and denying in part his motion to quash garnishments filed by Karen Niedbalski, n/k/a Lukas. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*410The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niedbalski-v-niedbalski-moctapp-2017.