Niece v. Weed
This text of 48 Iowa 698 (Niece v. Weed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action at law brought upon the covenants of warranty in a deed, and tried to a jury. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The abstract shows that there were no exceptions taken to the instructions, and no bill of exceptions signed by the judge. It fails to show that the evidence is all before us. No errors are assigned. Notwithstanding the absence of the necessary preparation indicated for the trial of the cause in this court, we are favored with an argument assailing the judgment on the grounds that the verdict is in conflict with the testimony,, and that certain testimony was erroneously admitted. We cannot consider the objections. The judgment of the District Court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Iowa 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niece-v-weed-iowa-1875.