Niebuhr v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Niebuhr v. United States

278 F. 523, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2849

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 9, 1922

DocketNo. 2939

StatusPublished

This text of 278 F. 523 (Niebuhr v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Niebuhr v. United States, 278 F. 523, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2849 (7th Cir. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of violating the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305), and assigns errors in the trial of the cause which deal with the admission of evidence and the instructions of the court. We are unable to consider their merit, because no bill of exceptions was presented or settled in the court below, and there is nothing to support the assignments of error.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment must be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of violating the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305), and assigns errors in the trial of the cause which deal with the admission of evidence and the instructions of the court. We are unable to consider their merit, because no bill of exceptions was presented or settled in the court below, and there is nothing to support the assignments of error.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment must be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 F. 523, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niebuhr-v-united-states-ca7-1922.