Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Niebuhr v. Pridgen Bros.

Niebuhr v. Pridgen Bros.

193 S.E. 597, 56 Ga. App. 668, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 199
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 5, 1937
Docket26388
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 193 S.E. 597 (Niebuhr v. Pridgen Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Niebuhr v. Pridgen Bros., 193 S.E. 597, 56 Ga. App. 668, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 199 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinions

Felton, J.

A nonsuit is proper where the evidence fails to show that a tort committed by an agent was within the scope of his authority or that it was authorized or ratified by officials of the defendant corporation having authority to do so. Wikle v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 116 Ga. 309 (42 S. E. 525).

Judgment affirmed.

Button, J., concurs. Stephens, P. J., dissents. A. N. Durden, J. M. Forrester, for plaintiff. J. W. Dennard, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parry v. Davison-Paxon Co.
73 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Auld v. Colonial Stores Inc.
45 S.E.2d 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Falls v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co. Inc.
31 S.E.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E. 597, 56 Ga. App. 668, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niebuhr-v-pridgen-bros-gactapp-1937.