Nie v. Beaux Gardens Associates, Ltd.

923 So. 2d 1200, 2006 WL 626104
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 2006
Docket3D05-935
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 923 So. 2d 1200 (Nie v. Beaux Gardens Associates, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nie v. Beaux Gardens Associates, Ltd., 923 So. 2d 1200, 2006 WL 626104 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

923 So.2d 1200 (2006)

Bryan Thomas NIE and Allen Miesch-Nie, Appellants,
v.
BEAUX GARDENS ASSOCIATES, LTD., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D05-935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 2006.

Frank B. Melchiore, St. Petersburg; Joel S. Perwin, for appellants.

Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel and Doreen E. Lasch and Hinda Klein, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before FLETCHER, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Thomas Nie and Allen Miesch Nie, plaintiffs in this negligence action, appeal an order granting a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. Finding that there was record activity prior to the filing of the motion to dismiss, we reverse.

This lawsuit, arising from an August 14, 1998 trip and fall accident, was filed on September 25, 2001. On October 23, 2002, an amended complaint was filed adding appellees, Beaux Gardens Associates, Ltd. and Aimco Residential Group, LP., as defendants. Prior to March 9, 2005, the last record activity in the case was a request to produce propounded by the defendants to the plaintiffs on March 3, 2004. On March 9, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a notice for pretrial conference and notice for case management conference with a proposed stipulation for case management order. These documents were docketed by the clerk of the court prior to the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution filed that same day by Beaux Gardens and Aimco. Plaintiffs' filing of the notices for pretrial conference and case management conference precludes dismissal under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(e). See Wilson v. Salamon, 923 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2005). We, therefore, reverse the dismissal order and remand for reinstatement of the action.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weston Tc Lllp v. Cndp Marketing Inc.
66 So. 3d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Norman v. Darville
964 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Miami-Dade County v. Walker
948 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Diamond Drywall v. Mashan Contractors Inc.
943 So. 2d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Reddy v. Farkus
933 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 So. 2d 1200, 2006 WL 626104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nie-v-beaux-gardens-associates-ltd-fladistctapp-2006.