Nidiffer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Nidiffer v. State

1912 OK CR 435, 125 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 370

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 26, 1912

DocketNo. A-1114.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 435 (Nidiffer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nidiffer v. State, 1912 OK CR 435, 125 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 370 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

*722 PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff in error, John Nidiffer, was convicted at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Ottawa county, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of sixty days and a fine of-one hundred fifty dollars. Upon careful examination of the record we find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*722 PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff in error, John Nidiffer, was convicted at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Ottawa county, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of sixty days and a fine of-one hundred fifty dollars. Upon careful examination of the record we find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 435, 125 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 721, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nidiffer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.