Nidiffer v. Nidiffer

1914 OK 542, 144 P. 350, 144 P. 150, 44 Okla. 218, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 676
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 10, 1914
Docket3868
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1914 OK 542 (Nidiffer v. Nidiffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nidiffer v. Nidiffer, 1914 OK 542, 144 P. 350, 144 P. 150, 44 Okla. 218, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 676 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Ottawa county by Lucy Nidiffer against Robert .Nidiffer for a divorce on the grounds of adultery and for alimony. Judgment was rendered in favor of Lucy Ni-differ for a divorce and $.1,600 alimony, which sum was made a lien on the W. J4 of the S. W. of section 5, township 26 N., range 23 E., I. M. Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and exceptions allowed.

The action of the trial court, in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, and, as all the questions raise.d by the petition in error occurred during the progress of the trial, we cannot consider them, in the absence of an assignment of error based on the overruling of the motion for a new trial. Avery et al. v. Hays et al., ante, 144 Pac. 624.

The cause should, therefore, be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennett v. Moore
1917 OK 70 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Witherspoon v. Smith
1916 OK 797 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Ledgerwood v. Neal
159 P. 292 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 542, 144 P. 350, 144 P. 150, 44 Okla. 218, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nidiffer-v-nidiffer-okla-1914.