Nidia Tanya Quistian v. State
This text of Nidia Tanya Quistian v. State (Nidia Tanya Quistian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00534-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
NIDIA TANYA QUISTIAN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Nidia Tanya Quistian, filed a notice of appeal challenging her conviction
for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. By order signed
November 1, 2012, the trial court granted appellant's motion for new trial.
When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, it restores the case to its position
before the former trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b). Because there is no conviction to be appealed, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Waller v. State, 931
S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1996, no pet.).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the
trial court's order granting a new trial, is of the opinion that the appeal should be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR
WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 7th day of February, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nidia Tanya Quistian v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nidia-tanya-quistian-v-state-texapp-2013.