Nicoud v. New York Life Ins.
118 N.Y.S. 1128
Opinion
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because the findings of fact are inconsistent and irreconcilable. See Israel v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 158 N. Y. 624, 53 N. E. 517: Nickell v. Tracy, 184 N. Y. 386, 77 N. E. 391; City of Buffalo v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 190 N. Y. 84, 82 N. E. 513, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 506. In this case the trial court has found all the controlling facts both ways.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicoud v. New York Life Ins., 118 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
118 N.Y.S. 1128 (Nicoud v. New York Life Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Israel v. . Manhattan Railway Co.
53 N.E. 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
82 N.E. 513 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Nickell v. . Tracy
77 N.E. 391 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)