Nicols v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Nicols v. State

56 S.W.2d 1118

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 25, 1933

DocketNo. 15489

StatusPublished

This text of 56 S.W.2d 1118 (Nicols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicols v. State, 56 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appellants, John Nicols and Josephine Goodman, were each charged by indictment with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. A plea of guilty was entered. Much evidence was presented by the state going to show the truth of the aver-ments. An application for a suspended sentence was made and submitted to the jury. No legal questions are presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appellants, John Nicols and Josephine Goodman, were each charged by indictment with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. A plea of guilty was entered. Much evidence was presented by the state going to show the truth of the aver-ments. An application for a suspended sentence was made and submitted to the jury. No legal questions are presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.W.2d 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicols-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.