Nicolosi v. Puleo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicolosi v. Puleo

202 A.D.2d 408, 609 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), dated November 8, 1991, which denied their motion for a default judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Rosenzweig at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), dated November 8, 1991, which denied their motion for a default judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Rosenzweig at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Nicolosi v. Puleo, 202 A.D.2d 408, 609 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 408 (Nicolosi v. Puleo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.